Exhibition Match Results

Formal Group

Formal Group-Champion-

Titular:Fnateoku dReedorer

Original Score:

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Comments:

yutong:1307 combo, very good. I hope that the mapper can decrease some notes, so that the combo would be 1304 for stable to replace the status of Calamity Fortune.(Fit 0 Local processing 13 Overall processing 18 Speciality 0)

AMAMI.A:Fantastic.

snowsurvivor:I have no word to describe how good it is.

Howard_Y:There is a large room for improvement, and the mapper has used most of the elements, so that the chart has a good foundation. But the overall length of the chart is a negative factor that cannot be ignored. What's more, the part which density is small is a bit weak, and the player will feel it is too long. Obviously, the mapper has not overcome the disadvantages of the song. In addition, there are many details in the chart that are worth discussing.

Formal Group-Runner up-

Titular:MALODY Chart Team "MYAMSAR"

Original Score:

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Comments:

yutong:Good choice for writing a difficult chart, and the structure for these difficulties is good. Though there is no problem to foloow the tunes, there is a part which is 210-270 is not so good to coordinate the passionate melody.(Fit 0 Local processing 15 Overall processing 13 Speciality 0）

snowsurvivor:It is interesting to use HS to make difference among each parts is interesting.

LuiCat:Idea arranged with experience, combinations polished with carefulness. Reference score (Structure 8 Combinations 9.5)

Howard_Y:The quality of the chart is very high, but some parts weren't devoted much to. In addition, it would be better if there wasn't HS 0.5 in 210-353 and add some 16th to make the difficulties of each parts look ballanced.

Formal Group-Third Place-

Titular:Firce777

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:To be honest, there is no complicated rhythm in the song. The chart in Jubeat is writing with holds and LN, maybe the song is not appropriate to write a Taiko map, but it is quite satisfying. The 24th blue notes are creatitive, but some parts of duplets are not so good.(Fit 0 Local processing 15 Overall processing 14 Speciality 1）

AMAMI.A:Fantastic

snowsurvivor:The chart is very interesting, but the overall density is a little much. And the difference of density among all parts is little, the density of previous part should be controlled.

LuiCat:I see the total idea of writing from the author. He structured the chart in cooperation with note combinations and carefully adjusted HS, which makes the chart uniform and suitable for the song. However, to be honest, some softlands (not to be confused with "fast notes") affects chart-reading in gameplay a little bit, which makes me slightly uncomfortable. (Structure 8.5 Combinations 8 Tricks -1)

Howard_Y:谱面整体还不错；9、77小节第三拍不需要写成二连；20-26、36-42小节写法不那么迁就说唱的话反而会比现在这样更好；50-53小节作为加速过渡段，密度可以适当降低。

Admirable Charts

Titular:potech4n_XD

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:A good choice for song with good writing, the whole color combination is conservative but rigorous. The ending part is a little lack of details,. Confusing duplets in 318. 383 is too easy while 397 is too difficult.(Fit 0 Local processing 11 Overall processing 12 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:It seems that the mapper is not so skillful to follow the tunes, the dealing with details in 72-76 is not so good. But the overall handle is good.

snowsurvivor:Good overall. The density of part after the previous one with 12th is too high. It would be better if the mapper control the density,

LuiCat:All-around good chart. Standard dealing of note combinations, patterns at designed or random positions. As for the idea of the chart in total, I feel it just fine. (Structure 8.5 Combinations 8.8)

Howard_Y:The overall processing is not bad, but I don't know whether there is creatitive rhythm or follow the vocal tones in 14-25. The duplets in 80 is not so good and necessary.

Titular:三体牛逼

Original Score:

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Comments:

AMAMI.A:初赛龙女仆 决赛库普兰？这应该是观课题赛某谱有感而发的作品。

snowsurvivor:整体没有什么问题，写的也很有意思，有一些地方选择不跟音是不是故意为之呢？

LuiCat:The author obviously know how the chart he/she wants it to be. The chart is dealt very smooth, with a fit and complementary flow of notes to the song, so it counts as a well-done chart in terms of ideas and some ways of writing combinations even if sometimes the chart seems to be failed in catching the tones. Is the author the one I'm thinking of? (Structure 9 Combinations 8.5)

Howard_Y:谱面整体风格比较奇特；由谱面个别段落可以看出选手跟音水平不错，但类似14、25小节不太契合旋律的写法本人不太喜欢；谱面诸多地方使用了32分音（包括自创，底音），但副歌前的其中一部分使用时机不是很好，甚至引起局部密度失衡。

Titular:そふらんちゃん

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:Camellia is god.(Fit 0 Local processing 0 Overall processing 0 Speciality 20）

AMAMI.A:55小节的三个蓝摆放错误。够混乱，甚至找到了打MM的感觉，kksk ffnb。

snowsurvivor:准头好像还不错，怀疑是卫星玩家。因为这曲子就长这沙雕样，我们也没什么办法，整体感觉还不错，就是GGT里的暴力插音还是有的，很像是哪个人的风格呢？

LuiCat:Idiot song. Apart from this, the chart has adequate dealing of colors and combinations, as well as visible patterns in segments. All these make the chart unusual, so it deserves a good score. (Structure 9 Combinations 9.5)

Howard_Y:整个谱面到处在浪费原曲元素，多处地方不但不好好跟音、跟词，反而用自创节奏盖过去，后面更是鱼蛋乱飞，可以说选手还没有达到驾驭此曲的实力。

Titular:2nurupo_

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:Good choice for song, it's the song by project B- without 32th. The dealing with pattern is satisfying.(Fit 0 Local processing 15 Overall processing 15 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:能选到这么好写的曲子也是一种本事，本质选曲大赛，曲子里有啥填啥就行了。就算这样似乎还填错了。

snowsurvivor:背景音太过突出，导致只要跟背景就能写出不错的谱子，很难看到作者自己的一些想法。在这个前提下，不仅选择全程跟音走毫无留白，跟音还有错误就更不应该了。

LuiCat:Well handling of positioning of notes in following the tones, however the colors seems to be not enough slightly to be satisfying. Also, the total idea isn't appearent enough. (Structure 7 Combinations 9)

Howard_Y:曲目本身已经给足了元素，谱面注定不会无聊，并且选手的发挥没什么大的失误；但我觉得一些地方的配色可以再优化一下。

Titular:Howard_Y

Original Score:

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Comments:：

yutong:Simplicity and simplicity, but it is not my cup of tea, because it is a little ordinary.The part with 12th is a little difficult. In conclusion, previous part should be added more notes to make the whole more interesting.(Fit 0 Local processing 6 Overall processing 8 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:主歌为什么要纯跟vocal 副歌ggt的鼓点也有些太万能了，只能拿到一个B+评价了。

snowsurvivor:跟vocal的地方有点多，不跟vocal的地方塞的太满，副歌密度太高，句式类似且中间没有空白，是不是会给人一种塞多了的感觉。

LuiCat:Smooth and working combinations, patterns in bars also seen. However, the fast notes doesn't solve fully the problem of frustration, which is caused by the song itself. Keep in mind that additional fun can be made from carefully adjusting the combinations, at the same time overcharting is strongly prohibited. (Structure 8 Combinations 8.5 Tricks 1)

Titular:miraclesurvivor

Original Score:

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Comments:

yutong:Awful colors. It seems that the mapper haven't played Taiko no Tatsujin yet. Maybe the mapper should learn more mapping skills from the game. The parts with one color are confusing. But the mapper is good at following the tunes.(Fit -4 Local processing -8 Overall processing 0 Speciality 1）

AMAMI.A:好一个Blue or Red?这刻意压天井的行为让我想起了某位同学。

LuiCat:It worth encouraging for the chart to have some special ideas, however the actual experience are not promising to me. It might be better if there's some modifications to the combinations? (Structure 8.5 Combinations 7.5)

Howard_Y:3、5、55、57小节首拍留白比较违和；6-9、58-61小节蓝音用法不明；12-19小节纯色思路太强行，不够契合原曲氛围；其他部分均有程度不同的细节问题，暂不指出。

Titular:とほゆと

Original Score:

Comments:：

yutong:Clumsy imitator of Dream Coaster. 33-34, there are some confusing big notes. The mapper use too much ctrl+c and ctrl+v, and the quailty of the parts which is copied and pasted is not so good. For example, the two big notes in 113-134 destroy the structure.(Fit -2 Local processing 3 Overall processing 0 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:可以，很dream coaster。

snowsurvivor:写的很飘，塞的很迷，在没有表谱的前提下这歌是否需要塞得这么满需要打个问号。

LuiCat:Soulless chart if it's like the Dream Coaster chart (c22653) but without the color patterns and a special GGT segment. Nonetheless this chart has adequate dealing of note positioning. (Structure 7.2 Combinations 8)

Howard_Y:谱面整体比较一般；8小节跟音错误；12-13小节的鱼蛋写法缺乏节奏感（其余类似位置同理）；副歌写法缺乏节奏感。

Titular:b\PA/ke \PA/li\PIA/

Original Score:

作者简介：ぱぱぱぱぱぱぱぱぱあ??

Comments:

yutong:Papapa, rough skills to follow the tunes. There is some advantages in the structure with swing rhythm. But because of the rough skills to follow the tunes, the overall doesn't look so good. And there are some big problems in 146-170, the 12th duplets and 16th notes are quite confusing, and the mapper ignore most of 24th notes in the song.(Fit -2 Local processing 9 Overall processing 6 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:11 15小节的五连应是o oo oo的格式。40 42小节的x xo也应是16分三连。浪费了极多的可写元素，这首曲子这么好写的情况下交出的这样的答卷着实无法令人满意。

snowsurvivor:选了个重复率很高很无聊的曲子，写了个重复率很高很无聊的谱子，背景仅有的一点点鼓点还浪费了不少，下届请加油。

LuiCat:This chart decided on fully following the lyrics with adequate color dealing. The total effect is fine, but it feels unsatisfying when there is obvious extra percussions sounds heard in the song. (Structure 8 Combinations 8.5)

Howard_Y:GGT部分几乎全部跟词跟到底，大量底鼓被浪费，使得谱面缺乏打击感；其他部分的写作思路经常在跟词、跟旋律、跟底鼓、自创节奏间摇摆不定，没有统一的思路；个别纯蓝段有些莫名其妙。

Titular:种花少女梦梦

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:The repeated structure is awful, e.g "ooox x o o xoox", I can't see anything about this rhythm in the song. The handle of this part is not comfortable at all. Because there is too many parts like this, if the mapper chose the song like this, the mapper should pay attention to deal with the repeated part.(Fit -5 Local processing -4 Overall processing 10 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:自创节奏虽然听起来有一些不协调，但是手感意外的还可以。

snowsurvivor:副歌的组合和配色有点过于丰富多彩了，适当的有一些重复或许会更好一些。开头和结尾结尾有几处地方听着有点奇怪，整体质量还可以。

LuiCat:I see that the author want some overall ideas and patterns for the chart, but the notes are not positioned well enough to catch up the song, and also the combinations of notes are not smooth enough in the remaining part. Other from these, the latter half of the segment of big notes in the beginning part is unsatisfying by not making use of the fading-in percussions in the song, which gives me a feeling of the chart failed to follow the progression of the emotion of the song. (Structure 8 Combinations 6.8)

Howard_Y:18-25小节为什么非要学本家的《Scream out!》不可呢？就算按旋律简化也绝不应该写成这种组合形式；主歌部分缺乏纵向工整；副歌部分的奇数连、偶数连混搭使用效果欠佳；原曲有不少地方适合使用长note，然而谱面中一个长note都没有，有些乏味。

Titular:David_Exmachina

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:Terrible choice for song. It seems that some mappers always want to challenge themselves.（Fit 0 Local processing 5 Overall processing 4 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:本就一般的选曲配上这样的塞爆，两开花，两开花，建议作者选择写作难度较低的曲子进行练习。

snowsurvivor:上届就说了这人的曲子一点都不好写，重复率高不说vocal曲基本都是一个味，这个不仅赛豹了密度还失控的厉害，下届再见。

LuiCat:Plain and mindless chart. To be honest the song is not easy to deal with for a good chart, and the author's work doesn't interest me as well. Other from this I have nothing to say about the chart. (Structure 6.5 Combinations 7.7)

Howard_Y:这个选曲实在有些糟糕；谱面前三分之二完全成了作者的自创节奏试验场，而且效果也很一般；副歌的厨谱段和鱼蛋也没有什么让人眼前一亮的内容。

Titular:XDEDY

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:用不完善的mc格式制作变速真是辛苦作者了。然而除了花哨的特效，本谱面基本没有什么亮点，部分复杂的曲子素材也没能得到利用。(Fit 0 Local processing 0 Overall processing 4 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:开 幕 雷 击，作为一个以变速特效为卖点的谱面，我觉得做的很失败。虽然看得出很努力，但是对曲子中元素的表现实在不尽人意，只能说一句抱歉。ps：全篇我最喜欢的地方是最后那个条子

snowsurvivor:辛苦作者了，写的也很有意思，但是在比赛里交这种作品会让评委很困扰啊（茶

LuiCat:特效玩脱了，我感觉不好。论评分而言似乎没有什么评论谱面本身的必要了？（思路6 组合7 创意-5）

Howard_Y:首先，大量软着陆段逼着我开BMScroll评谱，这已经是个相当低的起点了；再者，这曲摩擦音太多，本身不太适合写太鼓谱；我知道选手搞特效不容易，但抛去以上两点，谱面质量依旧不敢恭维，因此本人只能给予该谱面低评价。

Titular:freetadey

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:The mapping style is not Taiko no Tatsujin style. The color combination of previous part looks so monotonous. The mapper ignored so many 24th in the song. This made the song better than the map.(Fit 0 Local processing -8 Overall processing -5 Speciality 0）

AMAMI.A:我由衷的敬佩作者的想象力，好好的节奏难被写成这样。

snowsurvivor:这曲子应该是这种塞法吗？背景里的12和24几乎没有跟对的，下届再见。

LuiCat:It's a good idea that the author chose to write an ordinary chart, however I don't consider the result satisfying. Take a look at the chart: most segments lack interesting patterns, and the density of the chart are fatty and not fluctuating enough to be interesting because of the over-charted build-up and chorus segments. Obviously, the author has to be more careful at note coloring, so that the number of notes are reduced by using better colors while not reducing the fun of the chart. (Structure 7 Combinations 8)

Howard_Y:选手的跟音水平过于糟糕，大量原曲元素被浪费。副歌鱼蛋这么一糊，是想糊弄谁呢？

Guest Group-

Guest Group-Champion-

Titular:silk paraso

Original Score:

Comments:

snowsurvivor:前面有一段跟旋律的地方写的很飘，除此之外整体尚可。

LuiCat:Too obvious not to be a veteran author with this high level tone-catching.

Howard_Y:跟音相当准确（20小节让我惊叹），想必是初赛惜败的实力派选手。但有数处像28-31小节这样的段落，其配色不够契合半小节循环一次的旋律，需要改进；68-70小节的32分音塞得过于勉强，建议去掉。

Guest Group-Runner up-

Titular:1061

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，我喜欢低星。选曲很讨巧，作为自由区谱面已经很优秀了，唯有结尾的红2连，以及一些略音的取舍不太满意。

snowsurvivor:正歌写的太偷懒了。

Howard_Y:原曲的写作难度并不高，这使得谱面没有大的问题。但部分可为谱面增色的元素被作者自己的思路盖过，有些可惜。

Guest Group-Third Place-

Titular:Wing

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，比较复杂的选曲。作者并没有完全驾驭这样复杂的选曲，多处细节还有待提高。

snowsurvivor:虽然曲子很魔性，但是谱子好像还可以。

Howard_Y:原曲光是好好跟音就可以炸得很难。我不知道选手是不是故意打算简化，但很多地方写法抓不住重心，没有提炼骨干，总体而言这谱面实在算不上精彩。

Admirable Charts

Titular:日奈森亚梦

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，这很流水账。全篇下来作者采用的都是一些局部的陈滥处理，而没见到任何明确的思路，看起来像是想到什么就一路写到底了。这样的作品自由我能打合格，正式可是不行的。

snowsurvivor:选择了一个好曲子，没写好，正歌部分插音插得太多了。

LuiCat:Somehow overcharted.

Howard_Y:看起来比较平庸的厨谱，缺乏特色感，这归结于大局段落感不强，该纵向对仗的组合没有对仗（甚至没有横向对仗，如35-36小节），想到哪写到哪。

Titular:絶対魔法少女ピリかちゃん

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，这很harunaba。本谱面复制粘贴的痕迹相当明显，作者貌似没怎么花心思，不少地方的跟音不够完善。鉴于这是自由赛区我觉得还行。

snowsurvivor:写谱子少插点莫名其妙的偶数连。

Howard_Y:该跟音的地方跟不全，没音的地方乱插16分复杂组合，甚至还有些地方的思路莫名其妙（如38-39小节）。

Titular:Tanasn

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，挑战撞车上架谱的勇气可嘉。这谱面也完全不像个太鼓谱，光是跟音的话很难有足够的游玩乐趣，所以才讲究适当插音，上架谱就是你学习的对象。

snowsurvivor:密度控制的不够好，顶着两张上架谱撞车也是很厉害的嘛，可惜没有撞赢喔（茶

LuiCat:This is nothing like a taiko chart.

Howard_Y:谱面整体相当粗糙，几乎找不到什么可以表扬的地方；原本可以尽情插音的终盘GGT却变成了各种8分音，这放水是不是过分了？

Titular:Royal Punisher -Code:Q-

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，这很日姐。我觉得最神奇的是为什么后半部分音对上了？？？

snowsurvivor:浪费了一个好曲子，写了个这么个谱子。

LuiCat:Wrong BPM/offset. Mistakes at catching the tones.

Howard_Y:原曲应该是有微变速的，然而谱面并没有变速，结果就是到处歪。尽管谱面的大局结构较工整，自成思路体系，但整体插音杂乱，甚至不契合原曲。

Titular:misaka_No.114514

Original Score:

Comments:

yutong:可以，当一名作者还没有学会写好图的时候，他就已经会特效和爆炸了。

snowsurvivor:禁手，谱面密度失控且莫名其妙的东西很多，后面谱面和音源脱节了不知道是哪里的问题。

LuiCat:This is nothing like a taiko chart. BTW a small note followed by a big note at HS1.0 16th interval is prohibited.

Howard_Y:本人实在好奇这谱面是怎么写出来的，大多地方连小节都错位了（本人尝试砍掉4小节来审谱，到了后面还是错位了）。

Quest Match Introduction

Shojo to Tokei to Dorobo：

yutong:This Quest Match is the first time to try simple song with obvious rhythm like this. It is easy to write. Following the tunes is not difficult. Therefore, I will concertrate on dealing with colors and details. As a result, all mappers barely qualified in following the tunes, but are not good at colors. This kind of song shows the difference between the basis of the mappers. If we use more complicated song, it would be very easy for mappers to make mistakes in following the tunes though ideas are good. So we use this song in Quest Match.

snowsurvivor:It's very easy to write, so I will judge strictly.

Quest Match Results

Quest Match No.1

2C

Titular:potech4n_XD

Comments:

yutong:

AMAMI.A:I don't like the writing in Chorus, because it does not make sense. I think the mapper didn't devote time to deal with this part.

snowsurvivor:In the beginning, the first beat of the measures seems to be weird.

LuiCat:Perfect dealing of colors and patterns.

Howard_Y:This style is similar to someone. I'm looking forword to your new work in Formal Group,

Quest Match No.2

2E

Titular:David_Exmachina

Comments:

yutong:Proper chart, there are many details to adjust the colors.

AMAMI.A:There is no big problems but a little details should be adjusted. Looking foward to the good performance of the mapper in Exhibition Match.

snowsurvivor:Very good, 5 score for encouraging.

LuiCat:Correct tune-following, but the ideas under the pattern are not clear enough to say if it is not random at all, just not perfect enough.

Howard_Y:There is no sublimation in Chorus, because the mapper didn't control the density very well.

Quest Match No.3

2F

Titular:freetadey

Comments:

yutong:Abundant chart, I like it. But in the beginning, it seems it is necessary to use 24th 6-tunes. It should be less difficult.

AMAMI.A:There is regulation to write filled charts.

snowsurvivor:It seems that it was written a little difficult. But I am satisfied.

LuiCat:A little bit overcharted. Plain ideas but not bad.

Howard_Y:Some parts is filled with too many notes. (Maybe the style is a little similar to me)

Quest Match No.4

1A

Titular:2nurupo_

Comments:

yutong:The notes is the least but good writing, maybe there is a little room for improvement in dealing of colors and patterns.

AMAMI.A:There is not so many problems but a few problems in following the tunes.

snowsurvivor:There is a part which the density is so much that the density is out of control.

LuiCat:Standard answer. No more talking.

Howard_Y:The density is out of control in some parts.

Quest Match No.5

1C

Titular:XDEDY

Comments:

yutong:There are some special duplets, but some are good while some are not. The colors is ordinary.

AMAMI.A:There is room for improvment in colors and using big notes.

snowsurvivor:Some duplets are confusing, other parts look ordinary.

LuiCat:A chart with ideas but bad writing, not better than just following the tunes.

Howard_Y:The tritones are substantial in GGT. It may not have 4 score without this.

Quest Match No.6

2D

Titular:HXJ_ConveX

Comments:

yutong:Bad colors, the parts which is all blue notes seems not to make sence, the mapper should not use 'oxox' as main structure in Chorus.

AMAMI.A:It will cause opposite effect if the mapper is not good at inserting notes, and the spectral features are not so shaped.

snowsurvivor:Some parts with duplets are weird, and Chorus with roll is not good.

LuiCat:Not fit enough with the song. Better with more notes following tunes.

Howard_Y:The mapper has his own ideas. It is worth admiring. (Although I don't like some parts)

Admirable Charts

1B

Titular:Satinubes

Comments:

yutong:There is too much structure with 'oxox'. The mapper should try to change it. Not all parts are suitable.

AMAMI.A:There is room for improvment in using the big notes, not so many problems but not unique.

snowsurvivor:There is many vocal parts in low quality, many problems to deal with details. In short, the idea is confusing.

LuiCat:Bad choice of segments to follow the lyrics, as it's better to follow the drums for these segments.

Howard_Y:Some rolls are used casually.

1D

Titular:Zpmzpm

Comments:

yutong:Some duplets paint a lily, the whole looks not bad.

AMAMI.A:I advise the mapper should use 0.5x to correct the mistakes in following the tunes.

snowsurvivor:Why there are so many duplets?

LuiCat:A chart with ideas and relatively good writing; worth points though it's slightly overcharted.

Howard_Y:Some abnormal 7 tone is necessary to ues, and the amounts of roll is too little.

3A

Titular:kiminokokoro

Comments:

yutong:There is something wrong in following the tunes in 160-180, futhermore, it should be more blue notes. 233-257 is a trap, and the mapper jumped into it without worry. It should be lower density, because it destroys the atmosphere, and it does not do so well in following the tunes.

AMAMI.A:It looks good besides some tunes in the beggining, The most fatal flaw is the chorus after the beginning of the low-density segment vocal. It can be said that it is a pity.

snowsurvivor:The first half is fine, but why is it out of control after the low-density part?

LuiCat:A chart with ideas, but the transition after the sparse segment are not dealt good enough.

Howard_Y:Some repeated tones are ambiguous.

2B

Titular:Tanasn

Comments:

yutong:It looks too dense in 129-160, and then just runs account, it could be better if dealing with the fluatuating rhythm.

AMAMI.A:The beginning and ending are barely qualified, but there is something weird in the middle. The colors of Verse should be better. I don't know what happenned in Chorus at all.

snowsurvivor:To be honest, the dealing of shrinking is not so good. It is very terrible to use tritones in Verse.

LuiCat:Well done in following the tunes, but the patterns of colors and combinations are not taiko-alike, i.e. not rhythmic. (Same problem as 2A)

Howard_Y:Chorus part is not substantial.

2A

Titular:donder_L

Comments:

yutong:Terrible diary of events. some problems in the parts which there is few notes.

AMAMI.A:Mistery.

snowsurvivor:The density is terribly out of control. In the middle, The low-density part and Chorus which follows the tunes is quite messy.

LuiCat:Well done in following the tunes, but the patterns of colors and combinations are not taiko-alike, i.e. not rhythmic. (Same problem as 2B)

Howard_Y:It is failed to control the density. There is some mistakes in following the tunes in some parts.

1H

Titular:Franpigeon

Comments:

yutong:Monotonous accounts, irregular whole look. It seems that the mapper didn't devote ideas to the chart.

AMAMI.A:It wastes too many opportunities to make it better. The mapper should enhance the colors and the structure.

snowsurvivor:Overall shows that some parts of density are too high and the mapper can't control the density very well.

LuiCat:Chart not fit enough with the song & bad choice for combinations.

Howard_Y:Too rough.

1F

Titular:xsm

Comments:

yutong:To be honest, the ideas of chart is good, but why not try other two Quest Match charts if the mapper want to write something diffucult?

AMAMI.A:Jesus.

snowsurvivor:I'm sorry about the writing elegant.

LuiCat:Ileus.

Howard_Y:Many parts filled with many notes. Moreover, big notes used in wrong ways.

1E

Titular:YTnat

Comments:

yutong:

AMAMI.A:Are you joking?

snowsurvivor:I'm sorry that there are so many 15th notes.

LuiCat:15th note sucks.

Howard_Y:Many mistakes in following the tunes.

1G

Titular:Maruyama_Ayaya

Comments:

yutong:Floccinaucinihilipilification.

AMAMI.A:Feeblemindedness.

snowsurvivor:Noncontemporaneous.

LuiCat:Creative chart, in a bad way.

Howard_Y:Aozora no Rhapsody (Ura).

Click here to download tja

Organizers

Man in Charge (Kuromaku)

mdr9999

Judgers

laosibiniqiang

LuiCat

xipigu

Amami_A_Myamsar

snowsurvivor

Competition Flow

Match 1: Quest Match

Quest Songs Published: Jan 9, 2019

Quest songs and template charts are published, download-able via Malody game.

Submission Time: GMT+8 Jan 10 00:00 - Jan 23 18:00

Participants starts mapping and submit their charts.

Submission Publishing Time: Jan 24

Judging Time: Jan 24 - Jan 30

Judgers evaluates the submitted charts, and rankings are calculated.

Accepted charts are uploaded to the server, keeping participants anonymous by marking with numbers. Proxy statement is allowed if some participant wants to speak on behalf of its chart: Two oppotunities, up to 280 letters (bytes), send Blake the text and which place the statement to be published by original method of submission.

During this stage, stable charts of lower difficulties are published for play.

Result Published: Jan 31

Results(scores/ranking) of Quest Match are published. Member list who are admitted to Exhibition Match is also published.

Approved charts are set stable after match.

Match 2: Exhibition Match

Submission Time: GMT+8 Feb 1 00:00 - Feb 7 18:00

Submission Publishing Time: Feb 8

Top mappers who advanced from the Quest match can join as the Formal Group, and the top mappers in the group can win prize money.

In the Guest Group, contestants who joined the Quest match but failed to advance to the Formal Group can join. Or, if you show interest to Taiko mapping but missed the Quest match, you can join via the Guest Group too.

Judging Time: Feb 8 - Feb 14

Result Published： Feb 15

Submission Methods

By Email

You can send your chart file(.mc or .tja)to the organizer's e-mail address ([email protected]), note your Malody id in mail. After reply, your chart is accepted to the contest. Check your mailbox frequently to receive feedbacks.

By Tencent QQ

Add Friend to mdr9999 at QQ 1607639579 with annotation "Marlo Cup" and your Malody id. Then, send your chart file in way of Offline Files. After reply, your chart is accepted to the contest. Please keep contact with us.

Submission Requirements

After downloading template charts, you can use In-game Editor or any other notepad tools for mapping. We only accept charts in .mc or .tja formats.

The level of accepted charts must not be lower thanLv.15-Lv.39, which is Extreme(Oni) 5- stars to 10-stars based on standard from Taiko no Tatsujin (before AC15). Chart with over-ranged level would be rejected.

About .tja format: #GOGOSTART#SCROLL, #HBSCROLL, #MEASURE, #BARLINEOFF, and other unlisted commands for effects is banned from current match. Please be noticed that any uses of these commands will be removed with or without noticing.

Scoring Rule

In the judging section of Quest Match, each participant is given original scores in 0-5 from every judge. Total score of not less than the top 40% of the players admitted to Exhibition Match.

In the judging section of Exhibition Match, each participant is given original scores in 0-100 from every judge. Then final score is calculated by algorithm:

(1) Normalize scores of each judge.

For some judge, the maximum score from the judge is Smax, and the minimum is Smin. Normalized score S' is calculated by original score S:

S'=100*(S-Smin)/(Smax-Smin)

(2) Calculate the average score with half weight of the best and the least score cut down. (See descriptions below)

For some chart, the normalized scores are sorted to a list Si, with i between [1,n]. The score to be cut down (by standards of chart format) is Mis. Final score Sum of the chart is calculated:

Sum=(ΣSi-(S1+Sn)*0.5)/(n-1)-Mis

The Kuromaku also gives scores, for replacing scores of participated judges from themselves: If the judge get rank X from the Kuromaku, rank-X-score from the judge itself is used for a replacement.

Awards

Admittion to Exhibition Match (Quest Match Only)

For all contestants, at least forty percent of contestants is admitted to Exhibition Match in the Formal Group. Others can join via the Guest Group

Prize (Exhibition Match Only)

Exhibition Match's top few will be rewarded, the amount and the number of winners is to be determined.

Stabled Charts

Qualified charts are set stable, lower difficulties being completed by organizers.

Conclusion

The purpose of the competition is "exchange first, competition second", so we hope the participants, the audience and the members of the organizing committee be active and harmonious in discussions in compliance with the match rules, and try to avoid conflict with others.

Competition organizers (the Organizing Committee) has the final interpretation of match rules and all arrangements. Any comments or suggestions on the contest may be conveyed in any public communication ways, where members of committee are able to learn and reply, and we appreciate your discussion.