The 6th Marlo Cup Mapping Contest(Taiko)

End

Money prices will not be given to Kuromaku or judges. Amount will be discussed and rewarded as soon as possible

English comments will be translated for Japanese contestants soon.

Due to many unforeseeable reasons, the contest results are delayed. We are very sorry about that.

To see the contest reach the end means a new start. Please join again next time to reach for better results!

制作・著作

━━━━━

ⓃⒽⓀ

Formal Group Results

Formal Group Champion

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
88/10080/10094/10070/10090/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:でんしゃちかん

xipigu:很讨巧的选曲,低速节奏难作为骨架很容易写出有趣的谱面,作者也基本完成了这一点。使用的很多24分其实并不存在于原曲,不过大部分都能融入原曲并增加趣味。

Howard_Y:谱面整体质量尚可,16分音主体组合运用得当;曲子本身确实有一些原生24、32分音,但作者在运用上有些随性,不够系统(有些地方自创,有些地方可以跟却不跟),感觉这方面可以再提升一下。

Myamsar:山茶花写成这样想必是某位熟人。不多评论了(

LuiCat:很讨巧的选曲,谱面组合也做得非常流畅,我喜欢。(思路8.5 组合9 创意2 原始分数89)

Firce777:難得有人選了清新的花花,在曲子複雜的旋律下還能穩扎穩的跟音,說明作者具有一定的實力,我相當喜歡。

Formal Group – 1st runner up

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777Zpmzpm (Rank)
76/10083/10089/10074/10093/1004

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:A.I.AMMA

xipigu:很乱搞的谱面,开头31-64很谜,其他部分得益于这个选曲,跟着写就不会很差了,这样的话也没有体现出太多作者的能力。所以为什么要玩特技呢。。

Howard_Y:这曲子其实有不少地方适合写长note,写成完全精度谱实在是平庸了点;22-23小节的配色跟主拍和旋律都不搭,建议修改;26、30小节开头建议不留白;在36小节作留白的效果比在34小节好一些;63小节的16+24分鱼蛋有些突兀,个人略不喜;73-80小节这密度降低让我一头雾水,此处不是应该递进吗?

Myamsar:Everybody is crazy? It's a CRAZY JACKPOT!

LuiCat:干得不错。虽然开头的缩音跟音有点让人疑惑,但是开始出鱼蛋的时候疑问就迎刃而解了。加速段前故意压下气氛来,效果很棒。(思路8.8 组合9 创意1 原始分数89.8)

Firce777:這變速和超車夠坑,不過相當有特色不會令人反感,隨著音樂逐漸帶向高潮而跟進的微加速我很喜歡。

Formal Match – 2nd Runner up

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
90/10073/10093/10077/10086/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:mdr9999

xipigu:曲子有点长。不错的高速平A选曲,作者的发挥基本令人满意。

Howard_Y:或许作者是尽力了,但这个选曲实在太不行了,作为高速曲,一路打拍,缺乏旋律辅助,全靠自创,这意味着怎么写都不差,但也难以体现原曲特色(不如说就没有特色可以体现);55-69小节重复率太高了,建议作一些变式。

Myamsar:1 2 0 0 7 0 0 一个打起来很带感的谱面,让我想起了某份本家谱,可能是fujin rumble,记不清了。开头铺垫有点长建议优化。看自创节奏的熟练度应该也是某位熟人吧。

LuiCat:干得不错。偶数连的创作虽然看起来很棒,但是因为中间的间歇正好处于旋律开始的地方,所以显得有些奇怪。(思路9 组合8.6 创意2 原始分数90.4)

Firce777:密度與契合度兼具的譜面,偶數連增添了不少難點,不過前奏可以在多放些東西,別那麼空會更好。

4th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777Zpmzpm (Rank)
87/10080/10072/10075/10088/1003

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:xipigu

xipigu:无比扎实的选曲,只要跟着他走,很难挑出什么毛病.唯一不太满意就是xxxxo o oxoxo xx这个小节,可以改为更契合背景鼓点的配色。

Myamsar:梦回上届的Sarutobi Champion is 拙者,同样的填空游戏。所有的六连实际上都应该是五连,很画蛇添足。上届也说过这样的谱面很难看出作者的想法,我是不会给一个我10分钟就能填出来的东西打比较高的分数的。

LuiCat:干得不错。跟音严谨,段落思路也没有忽视。(思路组合9-9DA☆ZE! 原始分数90)

Firce777:配色單純又不失其韻味的譜面,能挑剔的只有六連的部分,拆成兩段其實更洽當些。

5th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
86/10078/10082/10075/10085/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:2nurupo_

xipigu:难度控制极致合理的谱面。如果在这之上再有一个里谱就是完美的作品,可惜大赛无法考察这方面。

Howard_Y:降速是一个不错的思路,但是42小节起就没有再降速的必要了;59、63、87-90小节太怂了,请用鱼蛋填满。

Myamsar:不愧是选曲大赛,怎么我就找不到这么好写的( 配色方面还能精进,有一些小的细节问题不说也罢。

LuiCat:干得不错。严谨的跟音效果很好。(思路组合9-9DA☆ZE! 原始分数90)

Firce777:打起來挺吃耐力不過卻很舒暢。作者發揮了曲子的特性,高低速的切換也令人滿意,不過我覺得還能再更塞點?

6th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777Zpmzpm (Rank)
83/10075/10089/10080/10082/1001

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Creator Titular:RE: How Ardor Verse Lept

xipigu:神秘的猫叉选曲,一些配色有点随意,例如前面的神秘24分。总体还是发挥了这曲应有的元素,只是结尾发狂有点辣眼。

Howard_Y:曲子本身提供的特色元素较少,这限制了谱面的发挥上限,游玩一两遍下来没什么让人有印象的地方;5-19、44-49小节的写法脱离旋律;38小节的24分音xxox没看懂啥意思;51-60小节插音过头,作为44-50小节的递进段落明显密度失衡;尾杀过于缺德。

Myamsar:总体很稳的一份谱面。第二段前奏跟的有些飘忽不定,主歌的24分是一个不错的想法,不过我个人会把它换一个地方。副歌前的气球最好补上那一个音符的空位,会更有连贯性。ggt的发挥很稳但是尾 杀 是 坏 文 明

LuiCat:(请求黑幕破例在评语区代言)这是一枚明显受到选曲照顾的谱面,前半有一些为了照顾思路以产生奇妙感受(比如24分)并不是跟音,有种瞒天过海的感觉,衔接和桥段搞了一些标准重复样式,副歌就顺着原曲走,做个很老实的缩音,自感并不能于本次某些谱面同台较量,实在惭愧。感谢大家对Malody做出的贡献,干得不错!关于本人评分的注解:因为各位的分数过于接近,并且规则要求取整数分数,为了突出小数点级别的差异,我将大家每人的分数减去75并乘5;因为我们有归一化规则(详见页尾大赛规则),这不会影响分数的公正性,但是可以让小数级的分数发挥作用,请不要惊慌,原始分数会像后面这样标注在括号里:(思路9 组合8.8 原始分数89.2)

Firce777:打起來相當有爽度的譜面,後段的密度漸增也很恰當的托出了曲子的高潮,沒什麼好說的。

7th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
75/10085/10091/10030/10076/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:snowsurvivor

xipigu:实在很没意思的选曲,可以说这样的选曲很难展现作者的实力。副歌如果继续跟旋律再做一些变化,似乎是本曲唯一能出彩的段落了。

Howard_Y:整体质量不错;33-44小节建议多点留白。

Myamsar:这份谱面刚好可以作为填空谱的反例。善用原曲元素的同时灵活跟音,并且ggt有属于作者自己的亮点表现,这样的谱面是不会吝惜给一个高分的。

LuiCat:总体上还可以的谱面,配色稍微有点欠优,但是其他方面基本上没什么可以特别点评的。(思路8.5 组合7.5 原始分数81 注意不是不及格!)

Firce777:第9小節開始和開頭的密度落差過大顯得有點突兀,雖然作者的思路很淺顯易懂也做得不錯,不過相較之下與其他譜面對比顯得有點失色。

8th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
73/10080/10077/10070/10080/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:okomech4n

xipigu:朴实的鼓谱面,1212的变式运用很灵活,不过实在是太粗糙了,这首歌很多地方只跟鼓的节奏不能很令人满意,需要作者自己想办法修饰。尾杀不搞难一点实在比较浪费。

Howard_Y:24、28、32小节尾拍个人倾向于不留白;39小节密度骤降有些破坏打击感;46-47小节跟底鼓作为过渡不够劲,不如跟歌词;68-69小节太平庸,组合应当更契合旋律一些,以便过渡到主跟旋律的70小节。我觉得这大概是某个熟人故意想撞我的,随你便吧(14年那会儿我还比较菜)。

Myamsar:主歌部分的跟音对象可以按段落适当变更一下,ggt的配置差强人意。总体来说尚可。

LuiCat:干得不错。xooox和oxxxo的对比思路我非常喜欢。BGM的offset似乎有点偏,建议在malody编辑器中打开一次谱面播放试试效果,因为次郎的延迟以及auto演奏(当然malody的auto也同理)实际上延迟是根据每个人的电脑而异的,而次郎没法对全部谱面进行整体延迟调整;malody的编辑器因为是像音频编辑器那样,在不增加设备差异的前提下严格按照规定的offset进行混音得到的音频,所以这个可以是绝对正确的参考。建议学习一下操作,仅供参考也好,因为我们主流意见(自从某一届Marlo Taiko大赛起便有的)是按照malody的效果来进行参考,感谢作者们对大赛的支持。(思路组合9-9DA☆ZE! 创意-1 原始分数89)

Firce777:不錯的譜面,建議後段可以再加點難度,不然像K社那樣搞點全16分也是不錯的選擇。

9th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
67/10078/10074/10080/10083/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:51Lv3r_Ph4n70m

xipigu:作者就把鼓音随便跟上了旋律,这不像一个鼓谱,这样的谱面出现在正式赛区肯定是不合格的。

Howard_Y:19、27小节的写法不够有过渡感;23小节迷之断句,不如一整个鱼蛋过去(结尾可以断一下);28-35小节明明写了两处24分音(原生32分音)却没写更多,不太明白作者用意(事实上我更倾向于直接削减28-35小节的整体密度);38小节起的密度/难点控制实在有些拙计;43小节迷之二连。

Myamsar:本质上来说这份谱面和SAY BAY一样是在做填空游戏,我更希望作者能有属于自己的表现。段落密度有少许失衡,建议适当加大ggt或减小主歌后段。第二次五连rush的后半段我会用一整个鱼蛋带过,这也算一种传统艺能。请不要止步于有什么写什么的层面,一份好的谱面应该是在原曲的基础上加以作者自身的发挥和所创造的特色的。只要我们不停下,道路就会不断延伸(指作谱之路

LuiCat:干得不错。其中原曲旋律中断的地方果断选择不插音,效果非常棒,原曲缩音谱面也顺着走,也顺出感觉来,这就很舒服。(思路组合9-9DA☆ZE! 创意1 原始分数91)

Firce777:吃了選曲的福,譜面緊跟著歌曲旋律,組合契合度相當高的譜面,打感相當好。

10th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777Zpmzpm (Rank)
70/10075/10085/10015/10082/1007

Note: Red fonted scores are for judges, calculated by choosing score on rank X from the judge itself, in which rank X is given by Kuromaku(Organizer)

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:倒れた宇宙の支配者 † 極‧Fͧ̊͗i͂̑̃r͊̊̏҉̗͍̻cͦ́̏҉̶͙̦eͨ͑̀7̑̓ͣ7̀̽̽7ͭ̅̊

xipigu:你好炸弹,最主要的问题倒不是太难或强行爆炸,而是在非难点段作者的处理太过随意了,随便用鼓去跟旋律,很多效果都不太理想,例如281-292,317-324等,353开始的主旋律段也没有写爽。毕竟难关段只是跟着山茶花走而已,处理好其他段落才是这样曲子的核心问题。

Howard_Y:64-65小节可以不用断开来写;副歌过于简单,建议加难;整体而言,32分用得还是保守了些,24分音倒是用得还行。

Myamsar:我就知道最后肯定是tmbpm402 真有你的啊( 倒不如说这个曲子就适合以这种形式存在。但是个人建议加一个hs或者bpm402调一个小数hs并适当进行变速,这样演出效果会好些。

LuiCat:爆炸段的写法基本没有问题,配色非常稳重,但是可能是原曲本身的原因,写出的炸谱打起来不是非常愉快。除此之外没有什么好点评的。顺便大赛提交这样的谱面会让人很头疼的,要为了这样的谱面多花精力斟酌评分,很头疼。依本届情况(大多数谱面都表现良好)我扣了巧技分,抱歉。(思路组合8-8DA☆ZE! 创意-2 原始分数78 注意不是不及格!)

Firce777:這7娘怕是不想活了,又靠著智障花花飛了一次天

11th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
83/10070/10070/10065/10081/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:Malody Majsoul Team "not HXJ_ConveX"

xipigu:仔细一看,这作者完全没怎么跟音嘛。。但是看着却挺像那么回事的,这样的风格十分大胆且难以驾驭,应当说作者做的还不错。272这种节奏十分迷惑,建议还是不要这样用。主要不满的就是141-198这里太过松散了,写的像个松谱,没有充分发挥。

Howard_Y:36-51小节和76-91小节同样是副歌,密度可以差这么远的吗?缺乏留白断句,没有长note,选曲也不怎么样,谱面是真的有些枯燥乏味;哪怕是无视这些因素,跟本家的《珈琲の味と》相比也还是差了不少。

Myamsar:为什么要难为自己选一首背景这么嘈杂的曲子呢。密度控制和跟音,配色方面都有着些许问题。在本届这个谱面质量偏高的环境下就显得缺乏竞争力了。

LuiCat:干得不错,但是有一处组合完全跟原曲不契合,成为了空想的构思:271拍(68小节第四拍)的ox ox,我实际重写附近的小节后发现,虽然这种构思有理可依,但是还是没有做到最好,实际上用ox xo会更契合原曲,而且仍然与之后的段落构成复现组合(后面有重复出现ox xo)或者对照(紧接的xo ox)。(思路9 组合8.5 原始分数88)

Firce777:挺有意思的譜面,可惜的是作者為了譜面的整體結構捨棄掉一些相當明顯的原生鼓音,多少還是會造成違和感。

12th

yutongHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
77/10065/10065/10015/10079/100

Note: Since the score are too similar, the score difference is magnified. The original score can be found under LuiCat’s comment.

Creator Titular:ジャンボオザキノワンポイントレッスン

xipigu:可玩性很高的精妙高速难谱,不过作者到底在这份谱面里加入了什么呢。。换我来写大概也长这个样子吧

Howard_Y:这样复杂度极高的曲子,如果能充分利用好原曲元素,就已经能称之为优秀的高速高难度谱面了,但这恰恰是一个难点;显然这个作者离充分利用原曲元素还差了不少,只是会抱原曲大腿的话在我这里是行不通的。

Myamsar:既然都写10星了就放开自我啊,选了个这么劲爆的曲子却这么缩简直太浪费了。所以说插音也是一门艺术,运用得当就会是很好的亮点。

LuiCat:跟音很严谨,但是在段落布局和谱面思路方面鲜有表现出构思,这可能是本曲的作谱难度所限,但是很可惜这样在我这里拿不到高分。其实为了照顾思路稍微炸一些也没问题,组合分不会仅因为跟音不严谨而拿到低分,因为跟音只是谱面契合曲目的一个手段而已。(思路7 组合9 原始分数78 注意不是不及格!)

Firce777:高速平A加上短氣球令整首譜面有一定的難度,大量的純色組合在高BPM的情況下也不會損失其聽感,後面倒是沒前面這麼契合了。(曲子好吵阿

自由赛区结果

Guest Group - Champion

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
8/108/108/108/108/10

Creator Titular:Satinubes

xipigu:剪歌好像剪歪了。基本满意的厨谱,一些句子衔接可以想办法优化下

Howard_Y:基本合格的一份厨谱,在自由赛区中质量上佳,没有搞错六分和附点八分节奏也可以表扬一下。

Myamsar:可能是正式赛区选手的手笔。如果35小节起的6分音改成大饼,配色不要这么1212的话我会打10分。很对胃口。

LuiCat:咬定散音来写的写法非常正确,不过配色有点多变,我更推荐学习本家的规律写法,或者在配色的规律上做些不降低契合度的手法(后者是高级手法所以请量力而行)。

Firce777:曲子的斷點處理得非常乾淨,沒有什麼可以挑剃的,唯一的缺憾是結尾的段落全是8分音處理,如果多幾個16分綴飾會更好。

2nd

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
6/107/108/107/109/10

Creator Titular:安徒生

xipigu:作者想法大体不错,但跟音细节上有许多小错误,开头二连部分比结尾省略了一个歌词重音,很谜。

Howard_Y:想必这位是次郎作者,但你开头有两个小节格式错了;主歌部分写得不太行,其他地方尚可。

Myamsar:配色和配置有提升空间。13小节开始的oo可以酌情替换成xo,ggt既然选择了跟歌词个人觉得1+2+4+2+1+1的配置会更好一些。总体质量在自由赛区可以排到上游。

LuiCat:还行,虽然配色稍微有点奇怪讲不出具体的点,但是基本上合格。

Firce777:作者對於寫譜擁有一定的基本功,偶數連的運用恰當其分,譜面結構也相當整潔,說實話這水平可以去正式賽區比了。

3rd

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
9/105/105/1010/107/10

Creator Titular:mikazie

xipigu:立派的鼓谱风格,然而只是大部分时间配色偏红会很古板,吉他发狂也不能免俗。

Howard_Y:谱面太专注于节奏感,把旋律几乎抛弃得一干二净,实在是算不上一份多好的谱面。

Myamsar:没能充分使用原曲的元素,也有很多谜一样的跟音。以及,这是7星?建议作者开低速精炼一下配置。

LuiCat:非常稳健的写法,没有什么致命错误,干得不错。

Firce777:組合的重複性有點太高,看到後頭其實有點疲勞。特別提一下25小節後的散音處理差強人意,而74小節的發狂換個思路說不定會更好。

4th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
7/108/105/107/108/10

Creator Titular:En-Thu-Si-As-Tic

xipigu:很吵,很脑洞的谱面,但是感觉和曲子的关联不是很密切。

Howard_Y:不少地方的奇数连+散音有些缺乏灵性,但好在段落工整和密度控制做得不错,在自由赛区中质量尚可。

Myamsar:第一印象就是乱,太多意义不明的偶数连了。自创节奏是一个高风险高回报的元素,使用不善就会是一份硬伤。

LuiCat:前半发挥的还算稳定,组合与原曲契合度很好,但是谱面自276拍(约第70小节)便开始离开原曲随意发挥,请作者尝试研究更合理更简单可行的缩音写法,虽然缩音比插音更难掌握,那样通常能得到良好的效果,而自由发挥很难在发挥思路的同时做好原曲契合,你的谱面这里确实失败了。

Firce777:這種曲子就是要高速平A才帶感,而作者也合乎我的期望,可惜的是70小節後配色和組合略亂,反而沒前面那麼有韻味。

5th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
7/105/107/109/106/10

Creator Titular:xsm

xipigu:挺有意思的低速选曲,作者对节奏基本还是跟到位了,但缺乏一些更进一步的细节处理,组合的规律重复等。

Howard_Y:缺乏特色元素的选曲配合白开水一般的谱面,实在难以给出多高的评价。

Myamsar:节奏感很强的一份谱面。如果能把大音符的运用精进一些会更好。

LuiCat:优良的跟音,舒适的配色与组合,写的不错哦,下届请加油进入展览赛正式赛区~

Firce777:全篇算是四平八穩的譜子,沒有什麼明顯的缺失。不過作者對於組合和配色的掌握度有待加強,結尾的謎之三連也讓我摸不著頭腦,總之請繼續努力。

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
9/105/104/109/107/10

Creator Titular:Malody Majsoul Team "not nikkukun"

xipigu:作为高速难曲,使用的组合有些死板。

Howard_Y:缺乏特色元素的选曲配合白开水一般的谱面,实在难以给出多高的评价。

Myamsar:前面空这么长本身就是作者实力不足的一种表现。不要写12分大饼。作者对于大音符的使用能力可以说是存在缺陷。全篇看起来也像是简单组合的堆砌。这么好跟的底音也乱的一比,很让人失望。

LuiCat:写的挺好我喜欢。为了影狼我给你14(减5)分,祝你至少拿到自由赛区2nd,做最自由的谱面。

Firce777:同樣也是高速平A譜,不過開頭就先來個禁手扣分,41小節後的段落思路嚴重失誤,這邊不應該塞太多東西。而後面的段落也錯過一些歌曲本身的素材,整體有待加強。

7th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
6/107/105/108/107/10

Creator Titular:kokoro chan

xipigu:合格的流水账,如果能注意利用曲子的重音就更好了。

Howard_Y:很多地方插音过头,也同时有些地方该插音时缩了,原曲元素表现得勉勉强强;个别地方的12分音系跟音错误。

Myamsar:诸多的细节问题堆叠起来就到了一个让人难以忽视的程度了。不光跟音问题,一个好的段落分配可以加强整个谱面的节奏感,作者在段落的间隔分配上也需要用心。

LuiCat:如果这是正式赛区,我会说配色组合发挥的不够精彩(个人意见,本届正式赛区鲜有平凡谱面),但自由赛区的话,我想说发挥的很稳定,请继续加油。

Firce777:譜面前半的發揮算是不錯的,不過後面反而拉低了前半的分數。62小節的休息段可以處理得別這麼制式,多點變化可以更有效果。後面的為了增加難度捨棄了一些歌曲本身的元素,反而本末倒置。

8th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
9/106/104/107/105/10

Creator Titular:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

xipigu:你好炸弹,除了太难了看不出什么毛病,但我希望你下次投一个评委能玩的谱面。

Howard_Y:可以看出作者下了很多功夫写这份谱面,因此评分不至于低,但不少细节还是有些提升空间。

Myamsar:开篇蓝就跟错了,细究起来有非常多的细节问题。就算是劲爆也要抓好细节的,如果细节可以我会打很高的分数。而且为什么劲爆不劲爆到底呢?浪费了很多原曲可以劲爆的要素,总体一般。

LuiCat:精彩精彩,还好不是正式赛区,要不然评分要花的工作量可就高得多咯(高BPM的小节数多,难以用游玩体验进行评价,其他方面标准也很难跟大家端平一碗水,具体实例见正式赛区GALAXY BURST)。除此之外针对谱面并没什么好说的,没有致命问题,好坏见仁见智。

Firce777:勇氣可嘉,作者放飛自我的態度我感受到了,37小節的變速相當沒必要,另外我不允許有人比我飛天(

9th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
5/105/106/106/107/10

Creator Titular:freetadey

xipigu:不太好写的歌,定式运用很娴熟的谱面,作者的感觉还不错,不过整体的配色显然需要大修。另外前面歪了应该是歌剪歪了

Howard_Y:一路塞爆,效果相当差;为何不考虑作些留白或者使用黄条/气球呢?

Myamsar:开头的4分音也太意义不明了,第一段前奏我都看不出来到底是跟的啥。ggt的配置也一般,一般情况下最好不要用蓝来作为一小节的开头。

LuiCat:虽然这首歌BPM已经很低了,但是更加尽人意的写法应当是更加保持老实的跟音,这曲子,你稍微多插音几个三连,谱面就已经显得很臃肿了,这样不好。开头部分最好也能跟音,跟原曲背景中的弱起和切分音,而不是8分音+插音,毕竟跟音不对,再加插音就更错上加错了。最后,请想方设法试着克服自己心里“不插音不把组合做复杂就是错的”这个感受,然后去体会低密度作谱在配色、思路以及手法上的妙处,这虽然很难,但是这是做好低BPM谱的最重要一步,就算是高质量作者也不得不先明白这点才能写好低难度低BPM谱面。

Firce777:我個人認為這曲子後面有為了湊777 combo而塞爆的嫌疑,其實這沒有必要,反而造成譜面的整體質量下滑。此外從29小節開始,每小節結束前的8分藍反而是個累綴。

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
7/106/103/105/108/10

Creator Titular:mashiro_rima

xipigu:很复古的谱面,这样的风格下需要更注重配色和突出起伏

Howard_Y:缺乏特色元素的选曲配合白开水一般的谱面,实在难以给出多高的评价;有几处过渡小节的偶数连对音歪了。

Myamsar:我实在是不好形容这份谱面,建议作者开一下playspeed0.5练习一下抓音吧。

LuiCat:谱面跟音和组合都没有做到位。原曲明显作谱有一些难度,但是如果谱面稍微进行跟音,则也不至于遭到这种低层次的批评。虽然有见重复组合这种优秀技巧,不过作谱基础做不好这种锦上添花的伎俩也白瞎。

Firce777:鼓性相當重的一張譜面,結尾並沒想像中的那麼好,不過作者的發揮也算令人滿意了

11th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/103/102/101/106/10

Creator Titular:dond

Howard_Y:前面对齐后面歪了,后面对齐前面歪了;尽管可以看出作者段落工整感尚可,但配置本身实在太塞爆且缺乏契合度了。

Myamsar:撞元首爸爸勇气可嘉,但是很可惜毫无可比性。不说小节线就是错的,主歌那段红rush和10492气球也太蠢了,你成功的让你这份谱面给了我一种当年观看av10492的感觉。

LuiCat:对错音这也太傻吊了,开头的OOooxxOO是什么鬼,开头都对不上的么,建议在ma开半速一边编辑一边预览看看你写的有多歪,已经在用的话请换副耳机吧。

Firce777:小節線是不是偏了?這10492的氣球實在沒有玩梗的必要,53小節似乎也偏了一個16分,希望作者更多注意些。

12th

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
1/101/101/101/103/10

Creator Titular:snzsQwQ

Howard_Y:我觉得这样的谱面是不配参赛的。

Myamsar:震撼我心了

LuiCat:您可不可以用谱面信息栏最下面的小节线设置把这摆在你脸前的错位小节线搞对位置再开始作谱呢?对音对不准可不可以对着编辑器里的大白点小白点写音符?不会写可不可以虚心向人请教不要这样出来丢人现眼?如果别人嫌弃你问问题,是否考虑一下自己是不是太过自以为是?请作者按这些问题对号入座,不管你是谁,我反正暴躁了,请你好好研究过初赛各位的参赛谱,沾沾初赛模板的光好好学作谱,每个3分以上的初赛谱都熟读百遍再来展览好不好啊?

Firce777:這該讓我從何評起呢?timing偏得跟月球一樣遠,我還真佩服作者有辦法在這情況下繼續寫譜,只好給你個勇氣分了。

Disqualified

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
4/104/102/103/106/10

Creator Titular:snowhalation

xipigu:有一点本家打call谱的味道,然而整曲堆彻的都是一些不合曲的厨谱片段,可跟的重音也不到位。

Howard_Y:全程除了副歌没有任何段落契合原曲,可以说完全浪费了原曲元素;某处黄条后接飞饼简直莫名其妙。

Myamsar:跟音逻辑混乱,建议明确目标。而且撞本家真的好吗?

LuiCat:这曲子本家有收录,黑幕没拦下来,我打算正常给你评分,但是请黑幕取消本谱面排名资格,否则这是对其他失误选本家收录曲的选手的不公平。谱面实则随机发挥,写了一堆自创节奏(即没有原曲根据而只希望鼓谱自洽的写法),并没有起到任何效果,也不适合本曲,而且实际上谱面质量也实在是不堪入目,其他段落的连续8分音不加中断的写法也一无是处。跟大家比起来,3分是个公正的得分。请多多学习本家谱,虽然有些本家的谱面过于放水(不是质量差,而是因为太过于重复或者使用常见节奏而写的不精彩),但是那正是一般谱面的标准合格做法。既然你的“大作”跟本家撞车,请多多利用好这个机会学习本家思路。(本家参考谱面链接

Firce777:先不論這首撞了本家,整篇的結構過於流水帳,後頭感覺就像是拿著正規的三連五連硬湊出來的一張譜面,沒有什麼記憶點。

Formal Match Charts

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

"尝试着写了一下はるなば在其他音游的供曲!一开始是向着「珈琲の味と」的方向去写的,结果打起来意外地有趣,于是便投到了本次展览赛中。"

09

10

11

12

Guest Group Charts

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

"永恒之核破碎之时,那是光,还是暗"

08

"//18个名字,9个人,3个小队,2个次元,1个组合,写作μ's,读作奇迹

斯人若彩虹,遇上方知有

从初识你们的欢喜到知道final live已举办的崩溃

遇见你们的时间不长,并不足以弥补那六年的遗憾,但自从遇见你们,便再也离不开你们

高坂穗乃果:最喜欢μ's

这个平时不爱学习,上课就困的女孩子,关键时刻动员了很多人,没有她的组织,就没有学校的后来,作为μ's的队长,她功不可没

园田海未:最喜欢努力

训练时严格的她总是有一种严肃、责任心重大的态度,虽然她平时喜怒不形于色,总是不敢做一些“破廉耻”的事情

南小鸟:最喜欢唱歌

我们永远不会忘记秋叶原的那个温柔贤惠的女仆小姐,永远不会忘记那声清脆的鸟叫

西木野真姬:最喜欢音乐

傲娇的她外冷内热,她所创作的曲子宛如天籁之音。“Start:Dash!”

星空凛:最喜欢跳舞

这个经常发出“喵”叫声的女孩子,是多么的活泼可爱,多么的朝气蓬勃

小泉花阳:最喜欢成员

我们不会忘记一说话就紧张的她却阻挡不了饭团的诱惑,一学年的三位学员们象征着μ's的未来!

绚濑绘里:最喜欢学校

很感谢这个学生会长,她经历过坎坷,但是她能在关键时刻站起来加入μ's,对μ's有着强大的指导作用

东条希:最喜欢每一天

有一种贤惠的人妻说的就是她吧,她漂亮,身材好,说话温柔,是μ's里的军师,是人们现实幻想的花季美少女

矢泽妮可:最喜欢偶像

感谢你的鬼畜,感谢你的乐观,感谢你成功带我入番,感谢你的“妮可妮可妮!”你对偶像的严谨态度,对弟弟妹妹的关心真的令我感动

如果奇迹有颜色,那一定是橙色//"

09

10

11

12

13

"看到此图时,今届的戏也就落幕了。"

First Round Results

Champion

3A

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
4/54/54/55/53/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: These harder charts are exactly what we wanted to see when we chose this song. Although there are not enough rests and some elements are not used fully, the processing of notes is well done.

Myamsar: The made-up rhythm at the beginning had a good effect. It would be better if there were more breaks

LuiCat: Faultless chart. Well done.

2nd place(s)

1B

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
5/53/53/54/54/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: It is very rare of the mapper that he/she only followed the drums, despite the melody being so ‘attractive’. But, I think that a chart is only god-tier when it can combine all the elements of the song.

Myamsar: Following the drums could work, but if they’re not done correctly they’ll create a dissonance in the chart.

Most of the song is wasted because the mapper only follow drums. You can try to separate the chart into different segments, and follow different instruments in different parts.

LuiCat: Well-made patterns. Hiccuped a little bit in fitting the song.

3B

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
4/54/55/53/53/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: The long notes are used very wisely – skipping a lot of the hard-to-map places. There is not much of a problem, I just don’t like it when participants use long notes to be lazy.

LuiCat: The 4th-note idea starting from beat 27 just lagged too long until beat 90, which doesn't allow the chart to follow the accending expression starting from beat 59 well enough, so that the chart misses the opportunity to make use of the decending expression around beat 90. In the chorus section, the chart seems to stick on writing blues at beat 2 and 4 in each bar without more designated patterns, which misses the opportunity to give the chart a better expression.

Other approved participants

1F

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
4/54/53/53/54/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: I like the kat notes at the beginning. Though I think the first half could be executed better by following some of the 12th notes.

LuiCat: Feels plain.

Myamsar: The mapper chose to follow some weird notes, but they still had a good effect.

1E

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
3/53/54/55/52/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: Plain mediocre chart.

LuiCat: Impressive patterns, fits the song well.

Myamsar: A chart with clear placements. Hope you can do well in the exhibition match.

3C

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/54/53/54/54/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: This chart fails its job of being a “repetitive” chart. Some notes are not even followed correctly.

LuiCat: Feels not smooth enough compared with 3A. Also lack of highlight spots in combinations.

Myamsar: The notes are a bit off, but overall it still deserve a passing mark.

Other Participants

2A

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/53/53/54/53/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: The charter’s hearing is not disabled. But, the free spirit of the mapper couldn’t fuse with the chart.

LuiCat: The chart looks good. Also noticeable in structure dealing. (Cannot make more comments because of lack of comparisons under the same song)

Myamsar: The charter purposely avoided mapping to the rap part, which is a shame considering it could be a great score boost. The chart is mediocre, though it could use some more notes and less big notes.

1G

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/53/53/53/53/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: The charter seems to not have any idea about the chart difficulty he want to map.

LuiCat: Good job at catching the melody and rhythms, but this chart is really lack of considerations in note combinations and patterns.

Myamsar: The start is good, but the chart gradually becomes ‘dry’. There is not much of a problem, its just not fun.

1A

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/52/53/53/52/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: The chorus is too influenced by the human vocal, causing it to be weird.

LuiCat: Annoying patterns (which is a bad idea for this difficulty).

Myamsar: The long notes are not useful.

1C

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/52/52/53/53/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: The charter lacks skill on deciding what to follow and what to not follow.

LuiCat: Feels good, but it's forbidden to have a big note following a small note with 16th note viewing distance, thus 1 point off from 4. (4-1=3)

Myamsar: This is a very long comment that Mr. Kuromaku doesn’t want to translate. Next kuromaku please adjust the score system so Mr. Myamsar can give 1.5.

1H

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/53/52/52/52/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: The structure is chaotic. I would give this a 1 if I wasn’t feeling charitable.

LuiCat: Plain patterns.

Myamsar: I think the charter is charting to “Treachery”. I think.

1I

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/52/51/52/53/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: This charter had his thoughts. But the abundance of long notes destroyed the feeling of the song.

LuiCat: Seen patterns, but lack good structural usages of them.

Myamsar: This was a fun chart to make, wasn’t it?

1D

xipiguHoward_YMyamsarLuiCatFirce777
2/52/51/51/52/5

Comments from judges:

yutong: Are you writing Hard charts? (Note from Kuromaku: when the mapper sent his chart he used “Hard” as difficulty name. So yes.)

LuiCat: I'm afraid that the author doesn't really know how a taiko chart works. Counting the forbidden two neighboring big notes at 16th viewing distance, you have to take the lowest score. (1-1=0, minimum 1)

Myamsar: Please don’t write 16th notes with big notes.

Sample Template

Google Drive

Baidu Pan (tja) (pass: j7d8)

Baidu Pan (mcz) (pass: dr43)

Committee Members

Kuromaku (Organizer)

Judges

Competition Flow

Match 1: Quest Match

Quest Songs Published: July 10 , 2019

Quest songs and template charts are published, download-able via Malody game.

Submission Time: GMT+8 July 11 0:00 - July 24 18:00

Participants starts mapping and submit their charts.

Submission Publishing Time: July 25

Judging Time: July 25 - July 31

Judgers evaluates the submitted charts, and rankings are calculated.

Accepted charts are uploaded to the server, keeping participants anonymous by marking with numbers. Proxy statement is allowed if some participant wants to speak on behalf of its chart: Two oppotunities, up to 280 letters (bytes), send Zpm the text and which place the statement to be published by original method of submission.

During this stage, stable charts of lower difficulties are published for play.

Result Published: August 1

Results(scores/ranking) of Quest Match are published. Member list who are admitted to Exhibition Match is also published.

Approved charts are set stable after match.

Match 2: Exhibition Match

Submission Time: GMT+8 Aug 2 00:00 - Aug 9 18:00

Submission Publishing Time: Aug 10

Top mappers who advanced from the Quest match can join as the Formal Group, and the top mappers in the group can win prize money.

In the Guest Group, contestants who joined the Quest match but failed to advance to the Formal Group can join. Or, if you show interest to Taiko mapping but missed the Quest match, you can join via the Guest Group too.

Judging Time: Aug 11 - Aug ??

Result Published: Aug ??

Submission Methods

By Email

You can send your chart file(.mc or .tja)to the organizer's e-mail address ([email protected]), note your Malody id in mail. After reply, your chart is accepted to the contest. Check your mailbox frequently to receive feedbacks.

By Tencent QQ

Add Friend to Zpm at QQ 2514013494 with annotation "Marlo Cup" and your Malody id. Then, send your chart file in way of Offline Files. After reply, your chart is accepted to the contest. Please keep in contact with us.

By Discord

Message Zpm#0830 through Malody Official Discord Server (link) and send your chart file. After reply, your chart is accepted to the contest. Please keep in contact with us.

Submission Requirements

After downloading template charts, you can use In-game Editor or any other notepad tools for mapping. We only accept charts in .mc or .tja formats.

The level of accepted charts must not be lower than Lv.15 or higher than Lv.39, which is Extreme(Oni) 5- stars to 10-stars based on standard from Taiko no Tatsujin (before AC15). Chart with over-ranged level would be rejected.

About .tja format: #GOGOSTART #SCROLL, #HBSCROLL, #MEASURE, #BARLINEOFF, and other unlisted commands for effects is banned from current match. Please be noticed that any uses of these commands will be removed with or without noticing.

Scoring Rule

In the judging section of Quest Match, each participant is given original scores in 0-5 from every judge. Total score of not less than the top 40% of the players admitted to Exhibition Match.

In the judging section of Exhibition Match, each participant is given original scores in 0-100 from every judge. Then final score is calculated by algorithm:

(1) Normalize scores of each judge.

For some judge, the maximum score from the judge is Smax, and the minimum is Smin. Normalized score S' is calculated by original score S:

S'=100*(S-Smin)/(Smax-Smin)

(2) Calculate the average score with half weight of the best and the least score cut down. (See descriptions below)

For some chart, the normalized scores are sorted to a list Si, with i between [1,n]. The score to be cut down (by standards of chart format) is Mis. Final score Sum of the chart is calculated:

Sum=(ΣSi-(S1+Sn)*0.5)/(n-1)

The Kuromaku also gives scores, for replacing scores of participated judges from themselves: If the judge get rank X from the Kuromaku, rank-X-score from the judge itself is used for a replacement.

Awards

Admittion to Exhibition Match (Quest Match Only)

For all contestants, at least forty percent of contestants is admitted to Exhibition Match in the Formal Group. Others can join via the Guest Group

Prize (Exhibition Match Only)

Exhibition Match's top few will be rewarded, the amount and the number of winners is to be determined.

Stabled Charts

Qualified charts are set stable, lower difficulties being completed by organizers.

Conclusion

The purpose of the competition is "exchange first, competition second", so we hope the participants, the audience and the members of the organizing committee be active and harmonious in discussions in compliance with the match rules, and try to avoid conflict with others.

Competition organizers (the Organizing Committee) has the final interpretation of match rules and all arrangements. Any comments or suggestions on the contest may be conveyed in any public communication ways, where members of committee are able to learn and reply, and we appreciate your discussion.

Sign inX

Sign in

Forgot Password? Register

Wait...